![]() |
|
|
Sign up to receive our biweekly email with insights and analysis on building materials and environmental health.
Current Newsletter:
|
Transitions In The Green Building World:
by Bill Walsh, National Coordinator January 5, 2006 December, 2005 witnessed two important transitions that will have far reaching impacts on the green building world in 2006 and beyond. We begin 2006 by acknowledging two scientists who have made important contributions to the green building movement. In Memoriam: Rick Maas, Ph.D.
In 2002, Rick developed an arsenic testing research project and a low-cost arsenic testing kit that he made available to HBN and citizens across the nation. [4] He went on to work with our colleagues at the Environmental Working Group to analyze test results from hundreds of samples submitted from across the country. [5] His work proved instrumental to our successful effort to phase-out most uses of arsenic treated wood, and was no less important to countless local initiatives to reduce children's exposure to arsenic. As recently as last September, Rick could be found in the news advocating for a community seeking relief from extensive groundwater contamination, in this case Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. [6] We at HBN truly admired Rick Maas. With the exception of the void now left in his loving family, there is no greater tragedy in his early death than the fact that so many students will now be denied his counsel and example of how to put science in service to the public interest. An Appreciation: Nigel Howard
As for the USGBC, it now faces a leadership void in two areas which Nigel continued to dominate in his final post as Chief Technology Officer. First, the Technical Science Advisory Committee (TSAC) process currently holds jurisdiction over one of the most contentious issues facing the USGBC: the status of PVC. [8] Second, the "LCA into LEED" process has been framed as defining a life cycle assessment framework for the development of LEED 3.0. This will set an important precedent with regard to the appropriate use of life cycle analysis. The landscape of the green building profession has changed dramatically since the USGBC initiated these two processes. The marketplace is rejecting PVC [9] and expanding professional literacy on life cycle analysis. As the USGBC considers new leadership for these initiatives, it is important to re-evaluate their mission and relevance to leadership in the contemporary green building movement.
HEALTHY BUILDING NEWS SOURCES
[1] Memorial contributions in the name of Rick Maas can be made to organizations listed here: http://www.unca.edu/news/releases/2005/Maas.html
[2] The Environmental Quality Institute, http://orgs.unca.edu/eqi/
[3] Volunteer Water Information Network, http://orgs.unca.edu/eqi/vwin.htm
[4] EWG's Arsenic Testing Kits, http://www.ewg.org/reports/poisonwoodrivals/orderform
[5] "All Hands on Deck" Environmental Working Group (2002) http://www.ewg.org/reports/allhandsondeck/
[6] "Feds, Scientists Differ on Role for Community in Lejeune Water Study" (Jacksonville Daily News, September 7, 2005) http://www.jdnews.com/SiteProcessor.cfm?Template=/GlobalTemplates/Details.cfm&StoryID=34814&Section=News
[7] "Nigel Howard Quits U.S. Green Building Council" (Building Design and Construction, December 28. 2005) http://www.bdcnetwork.com/article/CA6294390.html
[8] http://www.healthybuilding.net/usgbc/index.html
[9] "2005 In Review: The Year PVC Phase-Out Went Mainstream" (Healthy Building News, December 21, 2005) http://www.healthybuilding.net/news/pvc-122105.html
|
||||||
|
|||||||